Message boards : News : acemdshort application 8.15 - discussion
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 MJHProject administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications   | |
|
Dear all, | |
ID: 32034 | Rating: 0 | rate:
 /   Reply
Quote
| |
|
As Thomas Edison said | |
| ID: 32035 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
HA-SOFT, s.r.o. Send message Joined: 3 Oct 11 Posts: 100 Credit: 5,879,292,399 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications    | |
|
Get one 7.01 app for linux and failed. | |
| ID: 32036 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM]  Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level  Scientific publications  | |
As Thomas Edison said That task used "Long runs (8-12 hours on fastest card) v6.18 (cuda42)", not "ACEMD beta version v7.02 (cuda42)". ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA | |
| ID: 32054 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level Scientific publications | |
|
2 of 2 failed: | |
| ID: 32055 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Out of 6 that ran, one completed and validated. | |
| ID: 32057 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level Scientific publications | |
Is there a particular version of driver equipped? Stupid autocorrect. That should be, "Is there a particular version of the driver required?" ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA | |
| ID: 32059 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
703 is now built with CUDA 5.5, so driver 319.17 is the minimum required to run it. | |
| ID: 32068 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Looks like you get crashes even with 326.41. So maybe it is a problem with the app? | |
| ID: 32070 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Maybe post this also in the proper thread, sorry for double post: | |
| ID: 32072 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
petebe Send message Joined: 19 Nov 12 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,549,545,867 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Several 7.03 MJHARVEY ran successfully: | |
| ID: 32074 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Ok for me, | |
| ID: 32075 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Ditto: | |
| ID: 32076 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I see that there is a new app for windows just posted today (7.03), so I decided to give it another shot. This time success! | |
| ID: 32078 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Good, 703 worked ok. There's a new revision 704; please try that out. | |
| ID: 32080 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
(retired account) Send message Joined: 22 Dec 11 Posts: 38 Credit: 28,606,255 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications  | |
Good, 703 worked ok. Indeed, my Titan did 440 (!) beta v7.03 workunits while I slept and not a single error. There's a new revision 704; please try that out. Some validate ok, some error out after a few seconds. http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7176884 failed http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7176874 ok http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7176867 failed http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7176799 ok http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7176798 failed http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7176782 failed I switched to DP mode for the last three workunits (which also limits the clock of the Titan as you know), but no difference apparently (one ok, two failed). http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7176773 ok http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7176914 failed http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7176734 failed This is with nVidia driver 326.41, BOINC 7.2.11 and on Windows 7 SP1 64bit. | |
| ID: 32081 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Is anyone seeing failure of 704 on a card that IS NOT at Titan or 780? | |
| ID: 32082 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level Scientific publications | |
Good, 703 worked ok. There's a new revision 704; please try that out. Over night, my TITAN ran 50x 7.03 tasks. All validated. It also ran 3x 7.04 tasks. All failed. Here is a sample: http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7177032 ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA | |
| ID: 32083 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
bundaboy Send message Joined: 20 Nov 10 Posts: 6 Credit: 1,046,334,951 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications | |
Is anyone seeing failure of 704 on a card that IS NOT at Titan or 780? Just got 7 of them on my GTX460SE (314.22, WinXP), all ended and validated, no error. ____________    | |
| ID: 32084 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level  Scientific publications | |
Is anyone seeing failure of 704 on a card that IS NOT at Titan or 780? It's working fine on my GTX 670. It is a CUDA5.5 app? (according to its name in the BOINC manager it's a CUDA4.2 app, but the BOINC manager downloaded a couple of CUDA5.5 dll's with this beta app) | |
| ID: 32085 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I've run 10+ tasks on my machine with a 590 (dual GPU) and a 580. No problems at all. 320.49 driver. Should I try the 326.41 BETA driver too? | |
| ID: 32086 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
7.04 all failed for my Titan | |
| ID: 32087 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
3 failed, and 1 completed on 780 w/ latest drivers | |
| ID: 32088 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
(retired account) Send message Joined: 22 Dec 11 Posts: 38 Credit: 28,606,255 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Is anyone seeing failure of 704 on a card that IS NOT at Titan or 780? No failures on a GT650M (mobile, Kepler, 384 CUs), BOINC 7.0.64, driver 320.49. | |
| ID: 32089 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Ok, thanks. Looks like we'll need two apps, CUDA 5.5 (cc 3.5 or driver > 325) and CUDA 4.2 for everything else. | |
| ID: 32090 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Do you guys think there will be any performance improvements with 5.5? | |
| ID: 32091 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
nenym Send message Joined: 31 Mar 09 Posts: 137 Credit: 1,308,230,581 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Is anyone seeing failure of 704 on a card that IS NOT at Titan or 780?GTX 560Ti W7 64bit driver 320.19: no failures GTX 260 rev A.2 (65nm) W7 64bit driver 326.80: no failures! That is great. | |
| ID: 32092 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Only for cc 3.5, in the sense that those cards will now work! | |
| ID: 32093 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
acemdbeta version 705 now has two variants - | |
| ID: 32094 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
7.05 OK for my TITAN. | |
| ID: 32095 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Heading to work so can't test them, but nvidia today released driver 326.80. | |
| ID: 32097 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
petebe Send message Joined: 19 Nov 12 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,549,545,867 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Two 7.05(cuda55) downloaded and ran ok. | |
| ID: 32098 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
(retired account) Send message Joined: 22 Dec 11 Posts: 38 Credit: 28,606,255 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Unfortunately, Windows users with a cc 3.5 card, Windows, and driver >315.25 and < 326.41 will get work but should expect frequent crashes. MJH, understood and IMHO good enough for beta. But can't you take the OS into the equation and send 705-55 only to Windows hosts with cc >= 1.3 and driver >=326.41? (And 705-42 on Windows of course only to hosts with cc >=1.3 and <3.5 and driver between 295.41 and 326.41?) I can reselect all the options preferences calculation GPUGRID my account to receive all types of units ? Zarck, don't think so, at least not for Titan or 780 until a Cuda 5.5 application is released for short and long runs (non-beta): http://www.gpugrid.net/apps.php | |
| ID: 32099 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Unfortunately, the 7.05 beta still silently fails here (http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3437). Also, my attempts to attach tracing to the short-lived process when it comes available while true; do pid=$(pgrep -f acemd) && pstree -alcpsU $(pidof boinc) && strace64 -vfp $pid; done are also failing: strace64: attach: ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, ...): Operation not permitted Same with while true; do pid=$(pgrep -f acemd) && gdb -p $pid; done GNU gdb (GDB) 7.6 (Debian 7.6-5) This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu". Attaching to process 8561 warning: process 8561 is a zombie - the process has already terminated ptrace: Operation not permitted. I understand that you can not put effort into supporting each and every thinkable system, but it must be a small problem and if I'd better understand the cause it'd be easy to fix imho. Is there the possibility to put a tiny bit more debugging output in the beta versions? | |
| ID: 32101 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
HA-SOFT, s.r.o. Send message Joined: 3 Oct 11 Posts: 100 Credit: 5,879,292,399 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Ubuntu 13.04 64 bit Titan. 325 driver got 7.05 cuda55. | |
| ID: 32102 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Dear eMPee584, | |
| ID: 32103 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Zarck, | |
| ID: 32105 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
So far all WU's of ACEMD beta version v7.05 (cuda55) have been OK what I've gotten http://www.gpugrid.net/results.php?hostid=157253 | |
| ID: 32106 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Carlos Augusto Engel Send message Joined: 5 Jun 09 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,880,758,878 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications | |
|
70 ACEMD beta version 7.05(cuda55) downloaded and ran ok. No errors. | |
| ID: 32107 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
(retired account) Send message Joined: 22 Dec 11 Posts: 38 Credit: 28,606,255 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
120+ beta v7.05 (cuda55) and no errors. | |
| ID: 32108 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level Scientific publications | |
|
7.05 works fine on both my TITAN and on my machine with the 590 and 580. | |
| ID: 32109 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
I wonder what will happen when I eventually move them all into a single machine? I wouldn't expect any problems with the app. MJH | |
| ID: 32110 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
|
The acemd 7.05-55 app is running fine on my GTX 670 (WinXPx64, v326.80). | |
| ID: 32111 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Yes, TEST10 are 100x longer. | |
| ID: 32112 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
I suppose I get the 7.05 app when BOINC request new beta work? | |
| ID: 32113 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
You need to be requesting beta work and subscribed to application "acemdbeta" | |
| ID: 32114 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level Scientific publications | |
I wonder what will happen when I eventually move them all into a single machine? Yes, I believe the apps work. What I am questioning about is BOINC. Is it smart enough to request both kinds of work, and keep straight the two virtual queues of downloaded tasks? I know it works for ATI vs. nVidia vs. CPU tasks. But what about two different apps, based on slightly different versions of CUDA requirements? Will it always assign the right task/app to the right GPU? ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA | |
| ID: 32115 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Will it always assign the right task/app to the right GPU? You'll get the cuda-55 app for all of them, assuming the driver is >=326.41 Matt | |
| ID: 32116 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
petebe Send message Joined: 19 Nov 12 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,549,545,867 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
My Titan has run 4 TEST10's - all failed in around 61 seconds. | |
| ID: 32117 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level Scientific publications | |
Will it always assign the right task/app to the right GPU? Ah! I was thinking that the 580/580 were only 4.2. But I see they are 5.5 like TITAN. Got it. ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA | |
| ID: 32118 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
nanoprobe Send message Joined: 26 Feb 12 Posts: 184 Credit: 222,376,233 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications | |
|
660TI/Driver 310.90. XP Pro SP1 32 bit. CUDA 4.2 version 7.05 betas are now completing with out errors. 9 in a row and counting. Great work techs. | |
| ID: 32119 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Okay, I have all three cards in a single machine, and everything seems to be working fine. Just FYI, running into a 31 tasks/day limit. | |
| ID: 32120 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
TomaszPawel Send message Joined: 18 Aug 08 Posts: 121 Credit: 59,836,411 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications | |
|
http://www.gpugrid.net/workunit.php?wuid=4700082 | |
| ID: 32121 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Overnight 89 tasks with only 2 errors with test10, but the wingman with several cards have also errors there. | |
| ID: 32122 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
I noticed a few things in the last hour. | |
| ID: 32123 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Driver nVidia 326.80 Beta, | |
| ID: 32124 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
I have now two TEST10 that resulted okay. One on the 770 with driver 320.49 (cuda42) and one on the 660 with driver 326.41 (cuda55). | |
| ID: 32126 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
nanoprobe Send message Joined: 26 Feb 12 Posts: 184 Credit: 222,376,233 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Just received 1 that had failed on 2 other crunchers after about 1 minute. I'm 6 minutes in with only 5% completed but it is still progressing. All the ones before this one finished in about 1 minute. At the present rate this one will take close to 2 hours if it completes. Should be interesting. Task errored out at 50 minutes. Seems like these beta tasks that run beyond a minute or so end in an error. | |
| ID: 32127 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
Just received 1 that had failed on 2 other crunchers after about 1 minute. I'm 6 minutes in with only 5% completed but it is still progressing. All the ones before this one finished in about 1 minute. At the present rate this one will take close to 2 hours if it completes. Should be interesting. No, not all tasks, the TEST10 are longer. MJH said in this thread that TEST10 is 100 times longer. Indeed are around 2 hours on my rigs. Some errorred out, some did finish good. Your 310.90 driver seems to be the issue for the long ones. reead MJH post a way back in this thread for more information. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
| ID: 32128 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Carlos Augusto Engel Send message Joined: 5 Jun 09 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,880,758,878 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
After i update driver 326.41: | |
| ID: 32129 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Carlos Augusto Engel Send message Joined: 5 Jun 09 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,880,758,878 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Another task (cuda55) with the same error: http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7194889 | |
| ID: 32138 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Well, that shouldn't be happening. Could you PM me you app_info.xml please? | |
| ID: 32142 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Hello MJH, | |
| ID: 32143 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Carlos Augusto Engel Send message Joined: 5 Jun 09 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,880,758,878 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Interesting. I do not have one. My system in this case is: I7 Windows7 64 Boinc 7.2.5 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 (2048MB) driver: 326.41 And Tthrottle to proctect my cpu's from overheating. ____________ | |
| ID: 32145 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
OK, now I see why it's committing hara kiri. 706 coming soon.. MJH | |
| ID: 32147 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
I can find 3 type of error messages this one seems to be the most at hand: | |
| ID: 32151 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
707 is now live. Should be an end to the "max time elapsed" problem. | |
| ID: 32152 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
You broke something: | |
| ID: 32153 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Indeed I did. 708. | |
| ID: 32154 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
Indeed I did. 708. I had no luck with 7.08..... | |
| ID: 32155 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
Indeed I did. 708. Three more in a row is more than bad luck.... | |
| ID: 32157 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester  Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
All 7.08 WU's are failing: | |
| ID: 32158 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Carlos Augusto Engel Send message Joined: 5 Jun 09 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,880,758,878 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Didn't work for me either: | |
| ID: 32159 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
All 7.07 and 7.08 in errors, | |
| ID: 32160 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
709. | |
| ID: 32161 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
709. Still runs to an error right at the start. | |
| ID: 32162 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
710 for 55 with extra debug. | |
| ID: 32163 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I decided to grab a couple of these 7.10 debug versions. | |
| ID: 32164 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
It would be AWESOME if you could keep the "GPU Name" listed in the stderr.txt for the tasks. Maybe consider printing it each time the task is started/restarted (since it could restart on a different GPU!) Currently, I don't think I have any way of knowing which GPU(s) worked on the task. This is a very good idea. I've requested that in the "Wish List" topic before. | |
| ID: 32165 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
I decided to grab a couple of these 7.10 debug versions. The same happened on my host. | |
| ID: 32166 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
petebe Send message Joined: 19 Nov 12 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,549,545,867 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Same on my Titan - stopped at mark 15. | |
| ID: 32167 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Thanks guys. 711 has even more debug. | |
| ID: 32168 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Sweet news that the GPU printout is staying - hopefully you print it each time the task is restarted too, as I have 3 total GPUs in my system. Things that might prove useful: | |
| ID: 32169 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
petebe Send message Joined: 19 Nov 12 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,549,545,867 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Same on the Titan - di mark 13: | |
| ID: 32170 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
712. Almost at the bottom turtle now. | |
| ID: 32171 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
For v7.12, for me, they got as far as: | |
| ID: 32172 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
And yes, the GPU+version debug will be staying. If you want something else there too, now is the time to ask for it! It would be nice to have: - the manufacturer (vendor) ID - the type of the GPU - the number of the GPU - the memory size of the GPU - the clock rate of the GPU in the stderr output file. Something like in this post. | |
| ID: 32173 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
petebe Send message Joined: 19 Nov 12 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,549,545,867 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
yup - CPI MRK 8 | |
| ID: 32174 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
713 now | |
| ID: 32175 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
7.13 appears to start (and make progress) on each of my 2 GPUs (GTX 660 Ti, GTX 460). It does not crash immediately. | |
| ID: 32176 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Better kill that - it will make way too much debug. | |
| ID: 32177 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
You weren't kidding - 5 minutes created 140MB debug :) | |
| ID: 32178 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
For me, 7.14 is running/progressing at an appropriate GPU Usage, without any immediate crash. | |
| ID: 32179 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
petebe Send message Joined: 19 Nov 12 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,549,545,867 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
One 7.13 finished ok in about 7 minutes on my Titan. | |
| ID: 32180 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Carlos Augusto Engel Send message Joined: 5 Jun 09 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,880,758,878 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
One 7.13 finished ok in about 12 minutes on my gtx 680 | |
| ID: 32181 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
petebe Send message Joined: 19 Nov 12 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,549,545,867 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Three 7.14's completed ok. | |
| ID: 32182 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
My 7.14 task finished successfully too, but I don't know what GPU was used - that debug info has now disappeared :) | |
| ID: 32183 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
the webpage only show the last few lines of the debug. | |
| ID: 32184 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Carlos Augusto Engel Send message Joined: 5 Jun 09 Posts: 38 Credit: 2,880,758,878 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
One 7.14 finished ok in about 1 minute. GPU utilization ~ 72% | |
| ID: 32185 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
|
One short 7.14 finished fine. | |
| ID: 32186 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
One short 7.14 finished fine. The 7.14 has 10% lower GPU utilization than the 7.15, I'm going to abort the 7.14.... | |
| ID: 32187 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I've received a short 7.16 :) | |
| ID: 32188 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
I've received a short 7.16 :) It's finished ok, but the GPU usage is still 10% lower than the 7.15. | |
| ID: 32189 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
I've received a short 7.16 :) 7.17 is available :) I've aborted the 7.16.... | |
| ID: 32190 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
I've received a short 7.16 :) The GPU utilization of the 7.17 seems to be normal (95%) | |
| ID: 32191 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
On my eVGA GTX 660 Ti FTW (with the CPU fully loaded by CPU tasks), the 7.17 MJHARVEY_TEST10 task doesn't even reach 80% GPU utilization. Also, the drivers don't think the GPU is under enough load to ramp up the clock via GPU Boost. So, at 79% GPU utilization and 74% power utilization, the GPU stays at my normal 3D clock of 1045 Mhz, instead of the 3D boost clock of 1241 Mhz that I expect (and get from other GPUGrid tasks). | |
| ID: 32192 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
On my eVGA GTX 660 Ti FTW (with the CPU fully loaded by CPU tasks), the 7.17 MJHARVEY_TEST10 task doesn't even reach 80% GPU utilization. Also, the drivers don't think the GPU is under enough load to ramp up the clock via GPU Boost. So, at 79% GPU utilization and 74% power utilization, the GPU stays at my normal 3D clock of 1045 Mhz, instead of the 3D boost clock of 1241 Mhz that I expect (and get from other GPUGrid tasks). You should leave one CPU thread free per GPU (so on your i7-965x with 3 GPUs you should set the multiprocessor setting to 63% CPU). | |
| ID: 32193 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Nope. That's not how I roll. | |
| ID: 32194 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
No problem with GPU boost functioning correctly for me. | |
| ID: 32195 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
No problem with GPU boost functioning correctly for me. Give the 7.19 a try. One of my 7.17 long has finished, 3 more are near to completion. | |
| ID: 32196 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
No problem with GPU boost functioning correctly for me. There goes the 7.20 :) It seems to be running fine on my hosts. But I'm going to sleep in 10 minutes, and I'm going to resume the non-beta tasks I've suspended to give the beta units priority. | |
| ID: 32197 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
petebe Send message Joined: 19 Nov 12 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,549,545,867 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
A 7.20 has been running ok so far on my Titan - 25 minutes in. Looks like it wants to run about 90 minutes. | |
| ID: 32198 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH, you must be getting sleepy: | |
| ID: 32199 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
A 7.20 has been running ok so far on my Titan - 25 minutes in. Looks like it wants to run about 90 minutes. That's good news indeed! How much is the GPU usage? (on Titan and on GTX780) | |
| ID: 32200 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
petebe Send message Joined: 19 Nov 12 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,549,545,867 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Titan's GPU Load is 72%. | |
| ID: 32201 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
Titan's GPU Load is 72%. This should be higher at least by 20% with real workunits. | |
| ID: 32202 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
petebe Send message Joined: 19 Nov 12 Posts: 31 Credit: 1,549,545,867 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Agreed, unless it turns out we can run multiple instances? | |
| ID: 32203 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
80% on w7 | |
| ID: 32204 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Completed and validated my first MJH TEST10 | |
| ID: 32205 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
bundaboy Send message Joined: 20 Nov 10 Posts: 6 Credit: 1,046,334,951 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
GTX460SE, WinXP, 314.11, Boinc 6.10.58 | |
| ID: 32206 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Are you saying it failed? | |
| ID: 32207 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I’m seeing 85% GPU usage on a GTX660 and 80% usage on a GTX660Ti. ACEMD beta version 7.20 (cuda55).
<core_client_version>7.0.64</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # GPU [GeForce GTX 660] Platform [Windows] Rev [3170M] VERSION [55] # SWAN Device 1 : # Name : GeForce GTX 660 # ECC : Disabled # Global mem : 2048MB # Capability : 3.0 # PCI ID : 0000:02:00.0 # Device clock : 1032MHz # Memory clock : 3004MHz # Memory width : 192bit # Driver version : r325_00 # Time per step (avg over 250000 steps): 3.487 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 871.837 s called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]>
| |
| ID: 32208 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
bundaboy Send message Joined: 20 Nov 10 Posts: 6 Credit: 1,046,334,951 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Are you saying it failed? Nope, completed and validated - just the GPU utilization was low. ____________ | |
| ID: 32209 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Morning all. | |
| ID: 32210 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
The test WUs I care about are now: NATHAN_s1p_test_titans1 | |
| ID: 32211 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
The test WUs I care about are now: NATHAN_s1p_test_titans1 I've received a couple of NATHAN_s1p_test_titans2 workunits. They have by far the highest GPU usage on GTX670 and GTX680 (97-99%). | |
| ID: 32216 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Mine are almost complete, the titan WUs, currently @ 89% usage, which is where they should be for W7. Time to complete will be about 1:10 total. | |
| ID: 32219 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
The test WUs I care about are now: NATHAN_s1p_test_titans1 As some of you have noted, after the server/database error, they are now NATHAN_s1p_test_titans2 | |
| ID: 32220 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
The test WUs I care about are now: NATHAN_s1p_test_titans1 Yes http://www.gpugrid.net/result.php?resultid=7205032 @+ *_* Crédit 60,900.00 ____________ | |
| ID: 32221 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
I have one finished too in 2h43m. A new one is running at 94% GPU load and estimated time by BOINC 46h20m? 5% done in 8m, so BOINC needs arithmetic lessons :) | |
| ID: 32222 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
The test WUs I care about are now: NATHAN_s1p_test_titans1 You should fine tune your system (for example: leave a core free for GPUGrid), because 5pot's GTX780 finished a similar workunit in 4200 seconds, while it took 5000 seconds on your Titan. | |
| ID: 32224 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
(retired account) Send message Joined: 22 Dec 11 Posts: 38 Credit: 28,606,255 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Finished two ok in about 1 hr. 24 min.: | |
| ID: 32225 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
The test WUs I care about are now: NATHAN_s1p_test_titans1 I changed the speed of my Titan by enabling and disabling the double precision mode, being calculated, this probably explains the slow. @+ *_* ____________ | |
| ID: 32226 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
ExtraTerrestrial Apes Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester  Send message Joined: 17 Aug 08 Posts: 2705 Credit: 1,311,122,549 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
I changed the speed of my Titan by enabling and disabling the double precision mode Didn't read the entire thread, just in case it hasn't been mentioned before: enabling double precision mode disables turbo completely and hence locks the clocks speed at the base level - independently of double precision being used or not. This is a really crude solution from nVidia, they should have just let turbo cap the power as usual (from my point of view.. but I don't design these cards). MrS ____________ Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 | |
| ID: 32238 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
The test WUs I care about are now: NATHAN_s1p_test_titans1 Should those who don't have Titan or GTX780 opt out beta units? | |
| ID: 32243 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I have completed 3 of the I4R9-NATHAN_s1p_test_titans2 tasks successfully. The test WUs I care about are now: NATHAN_s1p_test_titans1 I think we can stay in the beta. The test, as far as I know, is if the application will work for any of the supported GPUs, including the Titan and GTX780. | |
| ID: 32244 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
No, it's correct. It is reporting the SM clock, which on pre-Kepler cards is double the main clock. cf http://www.nvidia.es/object/product-geforce-gtx-460-es.html
Yeah, that didn't look right. I'll see if it's possible. MJH | |
| ID: 32245 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
1) I noticed that it seems that my GTX 460's clock is erroneously doubled -- Take a look at the GTX 460 result below. Device clock should have been 763 Mhz, not 1526 Mhz. Both GPU-Z and Precision-X show 763 Mhz. Is your detection algorithm bugged somehow? There are two clock rates in the Fermi based cards (besides the memory clock rate): the core clock, and the shader clock. You are talking about the core clock, and the debug info shows the shader clock. As you can see, the shader (or CUDA core) frequency has a fixed (by hardware) double rate of the core clock frequency in the Fermi based cards 2) Also, for showing the driver version, although knowing the "branch" (r325_00) is handy, it'd be much better to show the actual driver version (326.80 in my case). Could you please make a change to include that? +1 | |
| ID: 32246 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
No, please stay in. It's important that it is tested as widely as possible before I push it out to the production queues. MJH | |
| ID: 32247 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Then could you please consider having it say something better than "Device clock"? I currently think "GPU Core clock" when you say "Device clock". Maybe "Processor Clock (MHz)", per the English specs found here: http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-460/specifications
Thank you -- Knowing the real driver version would be tremendously useful I think! | |
| ID: 32248 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
"You should fine tune your system (for example: leave a core free for GPUGrid), because 5pot's GTX780 finished a similar workunit in 4200 seconds, while it took 5000 seconds on your Titan." | |
| ID: 32249 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Thats its default boost clock. Different cards have different boost clocks depending on the quality of the chip. | |
| ID: 32250 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
"You should fine tune your system (for example: leave a core free for GPUGrid), because 5pot's GTX780 finished a similar workunit in 4200 seconds, while it took 5000 seconds on your Titan." Thanks to the detailed debug info, I've noticed the overclocking of the GTX780 too, still your running times should be less (even less than that overclocked GTX780's running times). I'll explain why: The GTX 780's clock rate is higher by 16.457% (1019/875) than your Titan's, but your Titan has 16.666% (2688/2304) more shaders (CUDA cores) than a GTX780. In other words: If we multiply the number of shaders and their frequency the result is a theoretical performance index: Your standard GTX Titan: 875MHz*2688=2352000 The overclocked GTX780:1019MHz*2304=2347776 As you can see, in theory your GTX Titan should be a little (by 1.8%) faster than the overclocked GTX780. Possibly the GPUGrid application can't feed that much CUDA cores. The question is why can't the application do that? Maybe your CPU is too busy to do that; Or this is software-related. To 5pot: Please share your secret with us: How could your overclocked GTX780 be faster than a factory clocked GTX Titan? What is the exact type of your GTX780? Are they water cooled? | |
| ID: 32251 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
No secret. I do a lot of research before I spend this type of $$$. Best GPU I've found, and apparently others have as well is the EVGA 780 ACX. | |
| ID: 32253 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level Scientific publications | |
|
FWIW, my TITAN does them in 4300-4600 with no threads reserved. I will try reserving a thread to see if there is any difference. This is not in the DP-enhanced mode. So it will automatically OC up as must as temps allow. | |
| ID: 32255 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
I check my Titan, the fan was full of dust is running at 836 Mhz, once cleaned, the card now runs at 928 MHz, the performance should be better. | |
| ID: 32257 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Should make quite a large difference. Please post a new update with latest times. | |
| ID: 32264 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Lazydude Send message Joined: 25 Sep 08 Posts: 12 Credit: 161,238,437 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications | |
|
Gainward GTX 780 Phantom (GLH) | |
| ID: 32265 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
In the last 24 hours my GTX660 got 10 ACEMD v8.00 WU´s and they all finished fine. | |
| ID: 32267 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
That's not a beta app | |
| ID: 32269 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
zombie67 [MM] Send message Joined: 16 Jul 07 Posts: 207 Credit: 1,686,026,456 RAC: 1,990,026 Level Scientific publications | |
FWIW, my TITAN does them in 4300-4600 with no threads reserved. I will try reserving a thread to see if there is any difference. This is not in the DP-enhanced mode. So it will automatically OC up as must as temps allow. After more testing, I see that my TITAM takes 4520 seconds with or without a reserved thread. No difference at all. ____________ Reno, NV Team: SETI.USA | |
| ID: 32271 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
That is good news. I have done the same test with my 660 and saw the GPU load fluctuating from 88% to 1-3% and longer run time. | |
| ID: 32272 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Correct! | |
| ID: 32273 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
FWIW, my TITAN does them in 4300-4600 with no threads reserved. I will try reserving a thread to see if there is any difference. This is not in the DP-enhanced mode. So it will automatically OC up as must as temps allow. That's goos news. Zarck's Titan still needs 4700 secs. Then maybe the AMD architecture is to blame for that. The AMD FX CPU don't have integrated PCIe controller, it uses a Hypertransport link to the North Bridge. The AMD 990FX NB has "only" 2x PCIe 2.0 x16 support, while the Intel i7-3770 and 4770 has (only one) integrated PCIe 3.0 x16. The PCIe 2.0 x16 is quite enough for the GK104 (up to the GTX 680 and 770), however it could be hindering the performance of the GK110 based cards (GTX780 and Titan), because they have 50% and 75% (respectively) more CUDA cores than a GK104 based card. | |
| ID: 32274 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Can we continue the discussion about CPU Integrated controller vs AMD chipset/CPU in the CPU Comparisons - general open discussion thread? | |
| ID: 32276 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I've had 4 NATHAN_s1p_test_titans2 errors on a GTX660Ti and 2 successes. Errors are of the form, | |
| ID: 32278 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
The Beta app is now live as ACEMD-Short. Version 800 | |
| ID: 32290 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Sweet! Did you get the "Driver version" thing figured out so that it'll show 326.80? | |
| ID: 32291 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
HA-SOFT, s.r.o. Send message Joined: 3 Oct 11 Posts: 100 Credit: 5,879,292,399 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
The Beta app is now live as ACEMD-Short. Version 800 Super. My Titan is crunching first Nathan's. | |
| ID: 32292 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Not yet. That'll follow later. MJH | |
| ID: 32293 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
dskagcommunity Send message Joined: 28 Apr 11 Posts: 456 Credit: 817,865,789 RAC: 0 Level  Scientific publications | |
|
Wow even on Fermi the new app is ~120secs faster ^^ | |
| ID: 32294 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Shouldnt there be a tick box for CUDA 5.5 under short runs, or am I missing something? | |
| ID: 32295 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
It's selected automatically, based on client driver version. | |
| ID: 32301 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Looking like 90 min for the short runs. | |
| ID: 32303 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I think that renaming threads is not nice. | |
| ID: 32305 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
In a week or so. MJH | |
| ID: 32306 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
dskagcommunity Send message Joined: 28 Apr 11 Posts: 456 Credit: 817,865,789 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
OK its good for cc1.3 cards too. Tried the 285GTX witch normally is retired from my side from GPUGrid, but now as Test good enough ^^ 26,241.59 secs = 7,3h | |
| ID: 32310 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Load on the graphics card to O% increase at 0%, I left the unit after 45 minutes. | |
| ID: 32466 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
You need app 8.01 and then the Noelia's run smooth as ever. | |
| ID: 32469 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
8.02 makes NOELIA tasks run even smootherer | |
| ID: 32483 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Retvari Zoltan Send message Joined: 20 Jan 09 Posts: 2343 Credit: 16,201,255,749 RAC: 698 Level Scientific publications | |
|
There is a 8.04 app in the Beta queue. | |
| ID: 32559 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
There is a new acemdshort application, version 8.11 (Windows only). Since this is (hopefully!) the last app revision, now's a good time to summarise the changes in the 800 series over the older app: | |
| ID: 32681 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Here is a list of compute errors codes for the 8xx series applications and their meanings. If you encounter a new one, or have a question or observation about the circumstances of an error, please PM me. | |
| ID: 32700 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
The beta's are gone and the Santi's start to error again on my GTX660. | |
| ID: 32719 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Short runs (2-3 hours on fastest card) v8.11 (cuda55) * -97 "Simulation has become unstable". This indicates that the scientific simulation that the application performs has gone wrong. If this happens as soon as the WU starts, there may be a problem with the WU. If it happens frequently or after the WU has made some progress, a hardware problem is strongly indicated. Check GPU temperatures (now reported in stderr) and for the presence of other GPU-using programs (eg games) - MJH Your temps look reasonable (mostly around 66°C). I suggest you restart the system, and if errors continue to occur look into what else might be causing this problem (games, video programs, antivirus scans, updates...). You might want to note the failure time and check your logs to see what was happening at that time or just before. Both times you had the error, the stderr log ends in, # GPU 0 Current Temp: 64 C # The simulation has become unstable. Terminating to avoid lock-up (1) The slight GPU temperature drop from 66°C to 64°C might indicate resource consumption by something else on your system just before the WU was ended, or the GPU temperature might just have dropped as the WU was ended? ____________ FAQ's HOW TO: - Opt out of Beta Tests - Ask for Help | |
| ID: 32720 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
The new app does a much better job at determining when a WU has gone bad and aborting. Previously this might have manifested itself as non-specific crash/driver reset. In some circumstances it may be possible to attempt recovery from this failure. Expect a new beta trying an idea out later today. MJH | |
| ID: 32721 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Thanks for the information skgiven (and moving my post). | |
| ID: 32723 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
Carlesa25 Send message Joined: 13 Nov 10 Posts: 328 Credit: 72,619,453 RAC: 23 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Hello: I have finished a task well 8.11 but comment some weird stuff. | |
| ID: 32735 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
Execution times I see them too long if I compare with other short tasks. I think that something does not work very well. Greetings. That is correct Carlesa25, there are problems with. There is a lengthy thread about this. Its this on: http://www.gpugrid.net/forum_thread.php?id=3450 If you start reading at the first post, you will quickly understand what is wrong. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
| ID: 32737 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I just had an 8.13 task result in: | |
| ID: 32743 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
Side effect of having more code blocked out in critical sections. As the article you found indicates, prompt terminating on suspend requires the monitoring thread to wake up while the app thread is outside a critical region. The only way this is going to get fixed to change the dumb way the boinc client lib blugeons the app process to death, and give the app opportunity to close down gracefully. This will take a bit of work, but it's high on the Todo list. MJH | |
| ID: 32745 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Thanks. | |
| ID: 32746 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Jacob, | |
| ID: 32747 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Jacob Klein Send message Joined: 11 Oct 08 Posts: 1127 Credit: 1,901,927,545 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Well, for my situation there, it was an 8.11 that caused the problem. | |
| ID: 32749 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
I have tested it on a NOELIA_INS task in order to get a beta. The suspending and starting again worked. (Not getting beta WU as it knew that a task was suspended :( ) | |
| ID: 32755 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 11 Jul 09 Posts: 1576 Credit: 5,812,611,851 RAC: 9,822,039 Level Scientific publications | |
The only way this is going to get fixed to change the dumb way the boinc client lib blugeons the app process to death, and give the app opportunity to close down gracefully. You have allies in the BOINC community. Eric Korpela of SETI@home wrote (on 13 Nov 2008 - unfortunately in a private forum I can't link): Yes, the terminate with no mercy policy sucks and we should find if there is a way around it, or at least a way to allow I/O to finish. About time we got round to fixing that... | |
| ID: 32757 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
nanoprobe Send message Joined: 26 Feb 12 Posts: 184 Credit: 222,376,233 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
First MJHarvey_Crash beta just finished. | |
| ID: 32760 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Your card mostly ran at 58°C, so it wasn't overly taxed by the Noelia_Klebe WU. | |
| ID: 32766 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
acemdshort is now updated to 8.14. This version has improved stability during suspend/resume. | |
| ID: 32815 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
nanoprobe Send message Joined: 26 Feb 12 Posts: 184 Credit: 222,376,233 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
My GTX660Ti also clocks up to ~1200MHz. That said I also get the odd error from it and other similar cards. Wish it was just an odd now or than error. I haven't had 1 NOELIA_KLEBE beta complete and validate yet. The all end with the time exceeded error after running for an hour or so. | |
| ID: 32817 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
I had one CRASH test overnight that took 22,493.99 seconds to complete. Checking the system shows that the one that was running on half the core clock of the GPU. So that is the explanation. However no reason in the stderr report, core clock was there reported as it should be, 1058MHz. I reboot the system and all is normal again. | |
| ID: 32826 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Carlesa25 Send message Joined: 13 Nov 10 Posts: 328 Credit: 72,619,453 RAC: 23 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Hello: 8.14 Tasks are running low load on the GPU <60% and also very unstable, varies more than 10% + -. in my GTX 770. | |
| ID: 32846 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
TJ, I guess you are referring to this WU, | |
| ID: 32848 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Carlesa25 Send message Joined: 13 Nov 10 Posts: 328 Credit: 72,619,453 RAC: 23 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Hello: If this task is completed, but is now running; SANTI_MARwt2-4-25-uan RND4912_0 with load <65%. GPU | |
| ID: 32849 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Carlesa25 Send message Joined: 13 Nov 10 Posts: 328 Credit: 72,619,453 RAC: 23 Level Scientific publications | |
Hello: If this task is completed, but is now running; SANTI_MARwt2-4-25-uan RND4912_0 with load <65%. GPU Hello: Regarding the issue of little use GPU if it has to be the way of working of these tasks, the solution will perform two tasks on the GPU to achieve maximum load. That those responsible will be interesting to confirm this issue in order to decide how to handle these tasks. NOTE: I happened to run two tasks at the same GPU 8.14 GTX770 and the total charge passed 55% to 70% + - 5% Memory 777 MB FB and BUS 22% and 8% 1254 Mhz GPU. | |
| ID: 32850 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
TJ, I guess you are referring to this WU, Yes, skgiven that is the one. Later this morning I had one error, but that did not down clock the core clock. But as these CRASH tests are Santi's SR and I had a lot of errors of them, my error rate has lowered significantly. ____________ Greetings from TJ | |
| ID: 32851 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
Carlesa25 Send message Joined: 13 Nov 10 Posts: 328 Credit: 72,619,453 RAC: 23 Level Scientific publications | |
Hello: If this task is completed, but is now running; SANTI_MARwt2-4-25-uan RND4912_0 with load <65%. GPU Hello: Sorry ... 8.14 my problems with no load on the GPU result from a corruption of the driver, reinstalled the question has been solved and GPU load is normal 85% + - | |
| ID: 32860 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
My Asus 770 runs at 91-92% GPU load steady, with core clock of 1097MHz, however I have it set to 1060MHz. This is for a Nathan WU and obvious no 8.14 app yet. | |
| ID: 32861 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
The server should now once again be dishing out Short tasks to Linux clients. | |
| ID: 33143 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
MJH Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Nov 07 Posts: 696 Credit: 27,266,655 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
I've promoted the 8.15 beta application to the short queue. | |
| ID: 34154 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
(retired account) Send message Joined: 22 Dec 11 Posts: 38 Credit: 28,606,255 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Unfortunately it does not remedy the current sudden reboots I am experiencing, pls. see report here. | |
| ID: 34157 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
The same type of WU that was restarting my system (SANTI_baxbimSPW2) now fails without restarting the system: | |
| ID: 34158 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
C:\ProgramData\BOINC\projects\www.gpugrid.net\acemd.815-55.exe | |
| ID: 34160 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Heard the fan on my GTX770 roar, quickly opened MSI Afterburner and saw the GPU power usage at over 4000%!! A few seconds later and the system restarted, blue screen... I guess the app has found a driver bug. | |
| ID: 34162 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
(retired account) Send message Joined: 22 Dec 11 Posts: 38 Credit: 28,606,255 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
That's interesting. As mentioned in the other thread, I tested a v8.14 short run with my GT 650M. The workunit did finish ok, but while crunching, the subnotebook shut down gracefully once. Very likely to prevent overheating, since the GPU temp. acc. to stderr.txt was at 85 °C at that time, which is unusual, esp. at the current room temperatures. I activated the notebook-cooler after that... | |
| ID: 34165 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
|
skgiven Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level Scientific publications | |
|
Upgraded drivers to latest WHQL but still got systems restarts and GPUGrid errors. Some fail with error messages, others just say aborted: | |
| ID: 34171 | Rating: 0 | rate:
/ Reply
Quote
| |
Message boards : News : acemdshort application 8.15 - discussion
